Fore! Supreme Court of Georgia Delivers Loss to Homeowners Asserting an Implied Easement in their Neighborhood Golf Course – Published in Mercer Law Review
An article by Joey Hargadon entitled “Fore! Supreme Court of Georgia Delivers Loss to Homeowners Asserting an Implied Easement in their Neighborhood Golf Course” was published in theย Mercer Law Review: Vol. 75: No. 2, Article 17 in March 2024.
The full article is available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol75/iss2/17.
Abstract:
The Supreme Court of Georgia delivered a big win to neighborhood developers and a massive loss to homeowners seeking to enforce easement rights in residential neighborhood features. Inย WS CE Resort Owner, LLC v. Holland, neighborhood homeowners sought an injunction against the developer of their subdivision to prevent the planned removal and redevelopment of a neighborhood golf course. The courtโs decision showcased that a mere label of โgolf courseโ on a subdivision plat is insufficient to show a subdividerโs intent to grant homeowners an easement in the recreational area adjacent to their properties. In clarifying what a petitioner must show when asserting easement rights in neighborhood features, the courtโs decision rang the death knell on nearly a century of Georgia case law. Consequently,ย Hollandย could seriously hinder homeowner litigantsโ chances in future cases against neighborhood developers.